The Problem of Student Engagement

AdamBindslevWhenever I hear talk of student engagement I wonder what the problem is. I doubt that it’s the students, their role possibly — but not them personally. I don’t buy into the idea that most of our students are lazy or incompetent.  Instead, I think they’re bored.  Every student I’ve taught could learn, just often not the same thing, or in the same way.  And when I’ve asked my students about it, I’ve always found they love to learn; they just don’t like school.

The research around student engagement has changed over the past 40 years.  During the 1970’s, student engagement research largely dealt with a marginal population that was disengaged from school and at risk of dropping out.  Jump ahead 40 years.  While this problem still exists, student engagement research deals with a sizable population of students.  In fact, the majority of our students aren’t engaged in their day to day learning. Depending on the survey, anywhere from 50 to almost 70% of our grade 10 to 12 students are not engaged in their learning.  That’s shocking.

When I first learned this statistic I was stunned. Moreover, research shows that the longer our students are in school, the less academically competent the feel (Covington & Dray, 2001) — even students who are considered “successful” in our current system experience this problem. That’s a pretty big deal. School shouldn’t be something you have to recover from, and for too many of our kids, it is.

What do I mean by the term student engagement? There are as many definitions for this term as there are words in this blog post.  Engagement is often broken down into different categories: social/psychological, behavioural, academic/cognitive, or some variation of these. Some deal strictly with behavioural compliance in a classroom, but that’s not what I’m interested in.   For me, engagement is  a genuine disposition for self-directed, deep learning, fostered from an early age and continues life long.  That’s the point of engagement, not to coherse kids into performing the tasks we want them to do.

One might think that our “top” students are engaged in their learning. Studies show most aren’t.  Successful students often describe their learning experience as “boring, hectic, stressful and disconnected from the real world” (Dunleavy & Milton, 2009, p. 11).  Many are simply jumping the hoops or “doing school” — hoping to move onto a better educational experience once they’ve graduated from high school. Unfortunately, with today’s current university system, many will be disappointed.

Too often I’ve heard students talk of their desire & need to escape the day to day educational institution. It saddens me because I know it can be so much more.  At the same time, it frightens me because research shows that a boring environment has a more powerful thinning effect on the brain cortex than an exciting or enriched environment has on cortex thickening (Diamond, 1998).  That’s a really big deal.

Starting in grade 6, student engagement begins to plummet, until about grade 9, when it bottoms out at about 30%.  I’m curious as to why this starts in grade 6. What happens in grade 6 psychologically or neurologically that prompts this freefall? And  just as importantly, can it be stopped or reversed?

Currently, I have a directed reading course on neuroplasticity & learning.  The change in an adolescent’s brain is immense, with large portions of the executive function and the prefrontal cortex maturing.  There is also a significant proliferation in dendrites & synapses that causes the adolescent cortex to thicken, before it goes through  6 or so years of intense pruning.  It’s vitally important that our students be deeply engaged cognitively during this period.  The brain works on a use it or lose it principle. So you can see why a boring environment having a more powerful thinning effect on the brain cortex than an exciting or enriched environment has on cortex thickening is a big deal. Boring classroom environments might actually be harming our students ability to think.

For my PhD dissertation I’ve decided to research student engagement, but not typically how it’s been done.  One of the gaps in the research is the absence of student voice.  Research tends to talk about kids, not with them. I hope to use youth participatory action research, as a means to not only amplify student voice around this issue, but also to empower students to change the circumstances in which they learn.  Participatory action research “seeks to understand the world by trying to change it, collaboratively and reflectively”. I think this process sounds a lot like me.  And I think it sounds a lot like the kids I’ve taught.  So many of our students come to school everyday hoping they’ll do something that makes a difference and engage in real work that matters.

Participatory Action Research allows students become partners and co-researchers in creating the education they want and need.  They identify the problems in their current circumstances and co-create the solutions. They write. They speak. They change, not only themselves but also the environment around them. In short, they make a difference.

My framework will likely be critical theory, which is about emancipation and transformation; it seeks “to liberate human beings from the circumstances that enslave them” (Horkheimer 1982, 244).  I think that might not be too far off from describing some of our schools.  It questions current power structures and seeks to understand the ways in which various social groups are oppressed. I include many of our students in this group.  They’re stuck jumping through hoops, most often without meaning, that someone else has created for them.  Most importantly, critical theory empowers students to transform their education.

My initial thought is to use a method like Photovoice, which I think authentically gives power to students.  Through photographing the everyday events of their lives and merging these with story, students will share what school is really like.  It is often used among marginalized people, and is intended to give insight into how they conceptualize their circumstances and their hopes for the future.  Photovoice attempts to bring the perspectives of those “who lead lives that are different from those traditionally in control of the means for imaging the world” into the policy-making process.

Our schools need to change, and the voices of our students need to be heard for this to happen successfully. I hope to use technology as a tool to give a voice to students who are normally silenced, while at the same time empowering them to use technology to create an educational environment that allows and fosters self-directed, deep learning. Now I just need a classroom…

Photo courtesty of cc. Flickr: Adam Bindslev

About these ads

About shelleywright

I love education & learning, which likely explains why I'm a teacher. My areas are ELA, Sr. sciences, and technology. My classroom is best described as a student-centred, tech embedded pbl/inquiry learning environment. I am currently a PhD student in the area of Curriculum and Instruction. My focus is play-based learning in high school, and it's impact on brain development.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

64 Responses to The Problem of Student Engagement

  1. Your research sounds very interesting, this paper, might be relevant: Edward Sellman (2009): Lessons learned: student voice at a school for pupils
    experiencing social, emotional and behavioural difficulties, Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties,
    14:1, 33-48 you might also be interested, in a less academic way, in this: http://globaldimension.org.uk/news/item/16251 Thank you for the blog post. Kind regards, Jo.

  2. John Norton says:

    What an amazing idea for a dissertation. I’m afraid many students are oppressed, sometimes by teachers who aren’t excited about learning – sometimes by teachers who are oppressed themselves. It will be exciting to see what results from your exploration.

    • Thanks, John. I’m really looking forward to doing this project. I think, in many ways, the entire system is broken. Many students are oppressed. Many teachers are oppressed, sometimes by extrinsic forces, but sometimes by intrinsic motivations, ideas & philopsophies. I think it also goes up the chain to principals, superintendents, etc. That’s why I think the critical theory framework is important. It’s time we call a spade a spade and begin to do what’s best for kids.

  3. Simon Clarke says:

    Unfortunately there are many districts that focus so much on test results and come down on schools and teachers who don’t “improve” and so many run and hide behind the “tried and true” methods that have helped them fly under the radar in the past. I truly believe it’s time to relook at the whole concept of curriculum and testing.

    • I completely agree. I don’t think standardized testing is good for kids. I also don’t think it shows much about real learning. But the loudest voices right now demand standardized testing. Students, parents, teachers, and divisions need to speak up against this and do what’s best for kids.

  4. Krista Willertz says:

    As usual, your content is relevant and makes me question the world around me. I’m anxious to read about your dissertation. Meanwhile, I’m going to work on giving my students more of a voice. Thanks!

  5. Pingback: The Problem of Student Engagement | Henry Wise Wood Learning Commons for Teachers | Scoop.it

  6. Pingback: The Problem of Student Engagement | Student Engagement for Learning | Scoop.it

  7. Pingback: The Problem of Student Engagement | Alive and Learning | Scoop.it

  8. MPNEngaged says:

    Reblogged this on mpnENGAGED and commented:
    Shelley ponders the concept of student engagement as part of her PhD dissertation.

  9. Techieang says:

    Awesome post! Is a great post to use as a springboard for discussion in our schools. Thanks! I hope you post updates on your process and findings.

  10. Pingback: The Problem of Student Engagement | 21 century education | Scoop.it

  11. I would offer my classroom, but I don’t know if you are looking for something local to you or are interested in doing it virtually. I teach in a New Tech PBL school in Michigan.

    • Thanks, Michael! At this point, I’m not sure what it’s going to look like. I want to do part of it with students in my own classroom. However, I think it would be very cool to also work with kids virtually. I’m looking to see how far I can stretch the boundaries with my dissertation, so I’ll let you know when I have a much better framework of what I’m working with.

      • Hello Shelley,
        This blog post has stuck with me for some time. I have revisited it again to check in and see if you have made any beginnings on your project. I teach photography at the high school level and am currently in a graduate program for Online Learning and Technology at Vancouver Island University. Your project intrigues me and I would love to offer my classroom to you or in colloboration with you. I havebeen teaching an inqiry- based approach for 3 years now. It was student engagement, or lack of, that keeps me changing and evolving my course. This year I am working on building an online photography course. I’d love to see your project possibly run as a MOOC? The possibilities are endless! Please contact me if I can assist it anyway. @jeankloppenburg
        I have been a fan of your blog since I began my masters in September. Many of your blog posts have made it into my own ePortfolio blog. Thank you for your efforts at recording your thoughts and making your learning journey so visible!

      • Thanks! I think this could be an amazing idea. I’m actually going to be teaching a photography class in the fall. I wonder if we couldn’t collaborate on a few projects & maybe start a collection of student voice work? S.

      • Hi Shelley,
        I would love to collaborate with you on a project! I am just finishing up my first year of a graduate diploma through VIU in Open Learning and Teaching. It is through this course work that I came acorss your blog. You have actually impacted a few of my own blog posts! To be actually working with you would be amazing and another exapmle of how powerful the network of open education and online learning can be.
        I currently connected with a former student of Alec Couros and she is willing to be a “mentor” and expert for my next years class of students when we embark on special effects. Her specialty is light photography. She even sent my students a video! Pretty cool stuff.

        Here is a link to my online learning website started with my OLTD program

        http://jeanklearnsonline.weebly.com/learning-journey-oltd-505.html

        I also have a created an online course this year for my students, my first attempt at a blended classroom. All the students created their on photography ePortfolios.
        Take a peak here: http://woodlandsphotographyonline.weebly.com/
        I look forward to connecting with you and possibly working together on a project, maybe connecting our two classes?
        Jean
        My email
        jeanklopp@gmail.com

  12. Pingback: The Problem of Student Engagement | gpmt | Scoop.it

  13. Pingback: The Problem of Student Engagement | Professional Learning for Busy Educators | Scoop.it

  14. Great post. Colleagues and I have recently discussed how we might positively affect student engagement in our school in order to boost attendance. I will be interested to know what your data says about the correlation between engagement and attendance, as well as following the progress of your Participatory Action Research. Thanks!

    • Current research shows there is a correlation between the two. Although some kids will show up everyday and not be deeply engaged in their learning. Often those are the hoop jumpers or the kids who feel a social connection to the school, but not necessarily deep, cognitive engagement. So it is possible to improve your attendance without challenging your students.

  15. Pingback: The Problem of Student Engagement | Pedagogy and Theories | Scoop.it

  16. Jackie Gerstein, Ed.D. says:

    Good for you! I absolutely believe that students should be part of the research process. See http://usergeneratededucation.wordpress.com/2010/08/03/youth-participatory-action-research-ypar/ I am looking forward to following your dissertation journey!

  17. ovcblog says:

    Do you think that by 6th grade “we,” the system, have beat the joy out of the students. They come sprinting in the doors when they begin kindergarten but by the time they reach sixth grade they barely have their hands raised. I have been fortunate to learn and educate K-12 and student voice is still not at the forefront. I would be interested to see what your research shows.

    Good luck.

    • I think there are so many factors that go into this problem, but what you’ve stated is certainly a large part of it. Most of our current educational systems aren’t great for kids. They don’t help them to learn who they are and what they’re good at or often even passionate about. But I know of many great teachers who are trying to change things, so I have hope :)

  18. Pingback: The Problem of Student Engagement | Collaborative & SDL | Scoop.it

  19. Pingback: The Problem of Student Engagement | HE Student engagement | Scoop.it

  20. cdsmeaton says:

    Great post Shelley! Our division is tackling learner intellectual engagement as well and a major focus is on the student interview. As a superintendent, I’m travelling to schools and talking to various students in grade 9-12 about their school experience. It is a way of creating student voice and allows me to hear what I need to hear! I absolutely love their honest feedback!

  21. Great idea! Great topic! This is a topic that I have pursued for many years and is one of the key elements for system redesign. I hope to hear/see more and am happy to share! See for example: @myphronesis

  22. Great idea! Great topic! This is a topic that I have pursued for many years and is one of the key elements for system redesign. I hope to hear/see more and am happy to share! See for example:
    https://theses.lib.sfu.ca/thesis/etd7313 @myphronesis (second try)

  23. Pingback: Mr G's Idle Musings » Blog Archive » My Diigo 01/12/2013

  24. This sounds exactly like my 13 year-old son in grade 8. He is a very good student yet he hates school! He loves learning but school does not fulfill him at all. If you ever need a child to participate in any way I think he would be happy to be a part of your research.

    • So many kids struggle with this problem, and it can be heartbreaking as a parent to watch. I’m not sure what the parameters of my research will be. I’d love to have “virtual” digital participants, so I may take you up on your offer!

  25. Pingback: Update: Diigo in Education group (weekly) | ChalkTech

  26. Mike Nantais says:

    Hi Shelley, what an interesting post – and dissertation idea. It will be interesting to follow your progress. I like how you will approach it from a Critical pedagogy perspective. If our paths cross at some conference or other, I would love to chat.

  27. Pingback: The Problem of Student Engagement | Wright’sRoom | LiterateOwl

  28. Pingback: It's Time for a Midyear Co-Teaching Check Up | MiddleWeb

  29. Pingback: MiddleWeb's Latest Middle Grades Education Resources | MiddleWeb

  30. lisamnoble says:

    Shelley:

    I’m looking forward to hearing how your research goes. After 20 years of teaching Core French to students from Grade 4-8, I can certainly support the research you’re finding that suggests that Grade 6 is where we start to see the drop-off in “engagement” – I also find it’s far more prevalent in boys, at least in the standard learning environment, where girls seem more willing to continue to jump through the same old hoops. The other place it shows up, in Ontario, is in our (blech) standardized testing results, when a group that excels at the Grade 3 testing nose-dives in the Grade 6 testing.

    Keep us posted – you always give me much to think about.

  31. Shelley,
    Love the notion of engaging students in “participatory action research” and see so many connections between their active involvement in formal research and inquiry and the post I did this weekend entitled, “participatory assessment”. I think if we show learners how integral they are to teaching, and point them towards they can shape their own improvement, engagement and improvement should improve.
    Having recently completed my doctoral program, I commend you on your research endeavour and wish you the best of luck! Can’t wait to hear what you find.
    Thanks for sharing,
    Tania

    • Congrats on finishing! Being at the beginning, the road to the end sure seems long & at times I’m not sure I’m going to make it. But I’m hoping once I get to the “research” portion, it will keep me motivated!

  32. Hi Shelley
    Thank you for writing this extremely thoughtful article. I’ll be following your research with interest.
    I wonder if I could offer a couple of suggestions, which might or might not be of use to you.
    The first is the ‘Circle of Courage’ http://twitter.com/imagineinquiry/status/286215091781763072/photo/1
    Which I’m sure you must have seen before but I think perfectly captures a process of belonging (student agency) that our current education systems ignore.

    The second is the work of Dorothy Heathcote who spent her professional life developing pedagogic approaches fostering collaborative learning environments and shifting the usual position of ‘teacher who knows’. Her most sophisticated approach is called mantle of the expert. you can find our research website at http://www.mantleoftheexpert

    Myself and a co-op of fellow teachers are currently building further website based on Heathcote’s mantle of the expert approach and her other work on drama for learning and inquiry, it’s called http://www.imaginative-inquiry.co.uk

    In imaginative-inquiry the teacher works in collaboration with the students to create imaginary contexts where the children experience the powers and responsibilities of being the ones who decide and develop a curriculum around themes that are interesting and meaningful to them.

    • Thank you for the terrific resources! We use circle of courage quite a bit in our school division, and I’ve used it before with learners, but hadn’t thought about it as a framework for this. But I haven’t seen Heathcote’s work before. Thanks!

  33. Pingback: EdTech Explorations » Blog Archive » Cool Tools and Resources to Explore 01/15/2013

  34. Pingback: Video as Project Based Learning | Technology in Adult Education

  35. Pingback: The Problem of Student Engagement | Integrating elearning into classrooms | Scoop.it

  36. Shelley I am intrigued by your comment, “For me, engagement is a genuine disposition for self-directed, deep learning, fostered from an early age and continues life long.” I understand the whole engagement issue but are we forgetting that these are children which whom we are dealing? And why are we so bent-out-of-shape because they say they are “bored.” Deep learning is actually quite tough, and yes probably, at least occasionally, boring. I would really enjoy a discussion of this with you.

  37. Pingback: Rethinking Reading for Learning with an Engagement Lens

  38. Pingback: The Problem of Student Engagement | WrightsRoom « The Sharing Tree

  39. Ron Wright says:

    Shelly, Please consider the works of Dr. Phil Schlechty in your work and research. He has written many books on the topic.

  40. Pingback: The Problem of Student Engagement | Engaging the Net Generation | Scoop.it

  41. Jim Cordery says:

    I think this is a great idea. I just finished Will Richardson’s book on PLNs and am now beginning to expand my personal learning network before sharing the idea with colleagues. The shift will be scary for many teachers, but something that needs to be done.

  42. David says:

    Have you heard of Student Voice? It might be of interest to you.
    “Student Voice aims to enhance the overall effectiveness of the student voice movement and create a greater understanding of why student voice is essential in the education and community ecosystems through our services-based approach.” http://stuvoice.org/about/

  43. Lou Wilson says:

    “Education either functions as an instrument which is used to facilitate integration of the younger generation into the logic of the present system and bring about conformity or it becomes the practice of freedom, the means by which men and women deal critically and creatively with reality and discover how to participate in the transformation of their world.”
    ― Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed

    Disengaged or disempowered?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s